<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for iUniverse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net</link>
	<description>official blog of composer, arranger and sound designer Alex Pfeffer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thandie Newton: Embracing otherness, embracing myself by Thandie Newton designer &#124; Celebrities 24x7</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=294#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Thandie Newton designer &#124; Celebrities 24x7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=294#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] Thandie Newton: Embracing otherness, embracing myself Â« iUniverse official blog of composer, arranger and sound designer Alex Pfeffer. Bio &#183; Audio &#183; Portfolio. categories &#8230; Thandie Newton: Embracing otherness, embracing myself. Not exactly music related but in the end it is all about inspiration! &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thandie Newton: Embracing otherness, embracing myself Â« iUniverse official blog of composer, arranger and sound designer Alex Pfeffer. Bio &middot; Audio &middot; Portfolio. categories &#8230; Thandie Newton: Embracing otherness, embracing myself. Not exactly music related but in the end it is all about inspiration! &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Alien Abduction Dreams&#8221; &#8211; walkthrough by Pacomusic</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=351#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Pacomusic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=351#comment-33</guid>
		<description>This is by far the best instructional music video I have seen! Thank You!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is by far the best instructional music video I have seen! Thank You!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on official demo for ProjectSAM&#8217;s upcoming &#8220;Orchestral Essentials&#8221;! by Alex Pfeffer</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=329#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Pfeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=329#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Thank you Armen! Yes, that&#039;s correct. I tend to separate the Kontakt instances from the ensemble instruments, to simply keep overview. I know that I could simply use separate outputs within one Kontakt instance if I put e.g. strings and brass together, but by keeping it separate I have more options on e.g. expanding stuff. Say I want to load additional solo strings but use the same amount of reverb or simply the same channel, I can still load it into the existing strings Kontakt instance. I know, generally you could just load additional instances etc. ... but after a while to me it feels getting cluttered when having like 3 or 4 Kontakt &quot;string&quot; instances spread over the whole list of VST instruments :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Armen! Yes, that&#8217;s correct. I tend to separate the Kontakt instances from the ensemble instruments, to simply keep overview. I know that I could simply use separate outputs within one Kontakt instance if I put e.g. strings and brass together, but by keeping it separate I have more options on e.g. expanding stuff. Say I want to load additional solo strings but use the same amount of reverb or simply the same channel, I can still load it into the existing strings Kontakt instance. I know, generally you could just load additional instances etc. &#8230; but after a while to me it feels getting cluttered when having like 3 or 4 Kontakt &#8220;string&#8221; instances spread over the whole list of VST instruments <img src='http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on official demo for ProjectSAM&#8217;s upcoming &#8220;Orchestral Essentials&#8221;! by Armen Chakmakian</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=329#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Armen Chakmakian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=329#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Nice composition.  It looks like you use each individual instance of Kontakt as a separate section of the orchestra, is that correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice composition.  It looks like you use each individual instance of Kontakt as a separate section of the orchestra, is that correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to promote yourself properly (on social media)! by Ditroiamusic</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=346#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Ditroiamusic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=346#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Great article! Very good points. Thanks for posting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! Very good points. Thanks for posting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Tsukiyomi&#8221; walkthrough by Sibyll Sewarte</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=312#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Sibyll Sewarte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=312#comment-29</guid>
		<description>This is such a powerful composition, i am able to see the entire ensemble in front of me! Great work - building it up until it&#039;s showing full power with the velocity at 127! Boom! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a powerful composition, i am able to see the entire ensemble in front of me! Great work &#8211; building it up until it&#8217;s showing full power with the velocity at 127! Boom! <img src='http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A thank you &#8230; and a rant! by Alex Pfeffer</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=326#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Pfeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=326#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Hey Dirk, thank you! ... and sure, you are welcome to send me tracks!
Honestly, I still can&#039;t believe that the above mentioned things are still an issue but you see this kinda happening in every creative environment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dirk, thank you! &#8230; and sure, you are welcome to send me tracks!<br />
Honestly, I still can&#8217;t believe that the above mentioned things are still an issue but you see this kinda happening in every creative environment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A thank you &#8230; and a rant! by Alex Pfeffer</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=326#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Pfeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=326#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hey Alex,

thanks a lot for your contribution and the kind words!
... and you are not ranting at all. In fact andbesides that, there is nothing wrong with a little rant, because it depends on the purpose of it. The stuff you have mentioned (plus the issues from my initial post) are clearly an issue of a lot of todays composers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Alex,</p>
<p>thanks a lot for your contribution and the kind words!<br />
&#8230; and you are not ranting at all. In fact andbesides that, there is nothing wrong with a little rant, because it depends on the purpose of it. The stuff you have mentioned (plus the issues from my initial post) are clearly an issue of a lot of todays composers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A thank you &#8230; and a rant! by Alex Stone</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=326#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=326#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Alex, a lot of sense in your blog. As the social media network thing reaches that point where it becomes &#039;normal&#039; to post output quickly (if it hasn&#039;t already), those who seek to create something assume they&#039;re under pressure to get it out the door quickly, and much of what is posted is mediocre, as a result. The SMN phenomenon of 5 minute turnaround, and that potential mediocrity, says more about those who post it, and their desire to be &#039;famous for a moment&#039; than a determined and quality controlled attempt to write something worthwhile.
Writing for the last big hit seems to be part of this as well. Again, it seems that so many choose this path, in case something rubs off, or an assumption is made that the potential to be &#039;spotted&#039; is there, and a perceived opportunity exists. I&#039;ve made it a point over many years to ignore musical sequels as it generally turns out to be a poor imitation.

As a passionate modwheel user, i can only add my vote and encouragement to composers who seem reluctant to take advantage of this powerful tool. With the wealth of hardware midi interfaces we have available these days, replete with CC assignable knobs, sliders, and buttons, it&#039;s easier than ever for composers to shape and mold a piece to a much closer representation of what he or she actually wants to say,  Buying a sample lib is just the first step. It&#039;s a base from which to experiment, and go further. As someone who was in on the whole music on a computer thing right from the start, i&#039;ve watched and heard so many fine writers shoot themselves in the foot by using a sample lib generically, with little concern for dynamics, incremental pitchshifting, and so on, but most importantly, using CC data to bring a piece to life, in their own voice and style. 

I&#039;m showing my age here, but there was a time when all we had to work with were legato and staccato samples from which we would create other articulations like tremolos, trills, etc, and in this environment, the modwheel, or some sort of CC tweak tool was essential. I&#039;d urge any modern sample lib owner to try the exercise of selecting a pair of P and F legato samples, and manually crossfading and shaping them until a good result is attained. The end result is likely to be more individual, and say more about the human being writing the music. We&#039;re fortunate to be spoiled for choice these days, and those marathon sessions manually manipulating CC data come about less often, but they shouldn&#039;t be ignore completely. Effort in, reward out, as my late grandfather was fond of saying.... I still write trills manually, and tweak each note in a staccato sequence not only for velocity, but pitch and time placement as well to get more life out of it. A lot of work, but there&#039;s a reward in the end result that is, as far as possible with pre-recorded samples, unique.

As i tweeted to you, the SAM lib demo sounds very good, and seems to be a well recorded lib. I listened to it from the above perspective, and  it possibly lends itself to a great deal of personal shaping and tweaking to produce something i want to say. 

Finally, i&#039;ll add to my vote to Nick&#039;s point about people being very busy on social networks. That&#039;s time taken away from writing, imho, if the balance is wrong. Setting aside time to be merely &#039;social&#039; is different to perusing good information and generously shared knowledge like your tutorials, and i&#039;d venture that for some, possibly many, a lot of procrastination goes on simply browsing social networks reading and contributing non-productive material, instead of soaking up and evaluating new and old knowledge (the modwheel example) with a view to enhancing one&#039;s own skills.

I guess this reads like a rant too, but i&#039;ve had a recent experience where someone i was collaborating with was more interested in social &quot;fame&quot;, than putting in some hard yards providing his share of a project to a high standard. I ended up with a lot more work to do myself, and would have been better off doing it myself in the first place.

I&#039;ve rambled here Alex, but your blog said many things i agree with, and i felt it worth reinforcing the points you&#039;ve made, as they&#039;re more honest than most. 

Regards from the &#039;other&#039; Alex.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, a lot of sense in your blog. As the social media network thing reaches that point where it becomes &#8216;normal&#8217; to post output quickly (if it hasn&#8217;t already), those who seek to create something assume they&#8217;re under pressure to get it out the door quickly, and much of what is posted is mediocre, as a result. The SMN phenomenon of 5 minute turnaround, and that potential mediocrity, says more about those who post it, and their desire to be &#8216;famous for a moment&#8217; than a determined and quality controlled attempt to write something worthwhile.<br />
Writing for the last big hit seems to be part of this as well. Again, it seems that so many choose this path, in case something rubs off, or an assumption is made that the potential to be &#8216;spotted&#8217; is there, and a perceived opportunity exists. I&#8217;ve made it a point over many years to ignore musical sequels as it generally turns out to be a poor imitation.</p>
<p>As a passionate modwheel user, i can only add my vote and encouragement to composers who seem reluctant to take advantage of this powerful tool. With the wealth of hardware midi interfaces we have available these days, replete with CC assignable knobs, sliders, and buttons, it&#8217;s easier than ever for composers to shape and mold a piece to a much closer representation of what he or she actually wants to say,  Buying a sample lib is just the first step. It&#8217;s a base from which to experiment, and go further. As someone who was in on the whole music on a computer thing right from the start, i&#8217;ve watched and heard so many fine writers shoot themselves in the foot by using a sample lib generically, with little concern for dynamics, incremental pitchshifting, and so on, but most importantly, using CC data to bring a piece to life, in their own voice and style. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m showing my age here, but there was a time when all we had to work with were legato and staccato samples from which we would create other articulations like tremolos, trills, etc, and in this environment, the modwheel, or some sort of CC tweak tool was essential. I&#8217;d urge any modern sample lib owner to try the exercise of selecting a pair of P and F legato samples, and manually crossfading and shaping them until a good result is attained. The end result is likely to be more individual, and say more about the human being writing the music. We&#8217;re fortunate to be spoiled for choice these days, and those marathon sessions manually manipulating CC data come about less often, but they shouldn&#8217;t be ignore completely. Effort in, reward out, as my late grandfather was fond of saying&#8230;. I still write trills manually, and tweak each note in a staccato sequence not only for velocity, but pitch and time placement as well to get more life out of it. A lot of work, but there&#8217;s a reward in the end result that is, as far as possible with pre-recorded samples, unique.</p>
<p>As i tweeted to you, the SAM lib demo sounds very good, and seems to be a well recorded lib. I listened to it from the above perspective, and  it possibly lends itself to a great deal of personal shaping and tweaking to produce something i want to say. </p>
<p>Finally, i&#8217;ll add to my vote to Nick&#8217;s point about people being very busy on social networks. That&#8217;s time taken away from writing, imho, if the balance is wrong. Setting aside time to be merely &#8216;social&#8217; is different to perusing good information and generously shared knowledge like your tutorials, and i&#8217;d venture that for some, possibly many, a lot of procrastination goes on simply browsing social networks reading and contributing non-productive material, instead of soaking up and evaluating new and old knowledge (the modwheel example) with a view to enhancing one&#8217;s own skills.</p>
<p>I guess this reads like a rant too, but i&#8217;ve had a recent experience where someone i was collaborating with was more interested in social &#8220;fame&#8221;, than putting in some hard yards providing his share of a project to a high standard. I ended up with a lot more work to do myself, and would have been better off doing it myself in the first place.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve rambled here Alex, but your blog said many things i agree with, and i felt it worth reinforcing the points you&#8217;ve made, as they&#8217;re more honest than most. </p>
<p>Regards from the &#8216;other&#8217; Alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A thank you &#8230; and a rant! by Alex Pfeffer</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=326#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Pfeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/?p=326#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick, thanks so much for your comment! Much appreciated!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick, thanks so much for your comment! Much appreciated!! <img src='http://blog.alexpfeffer.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

